Lower Blood Pressure Naturally

Do you have high blood pressure (or does your doctor say you have hypertension)?

Do you dread your visit to the doctor and that moment when you have to remove your jacket or roll up for sleeve for the blood pressure check? (Oh Lord, is it going to be as high as last time? Is he going to insist on a prescription this time?)

If that sounds familiar you may be one of the many who are routinely diagnosed with high blood pressure through readings in the doctor’s office. You could be one of the thousands, maybe even millions, who have been misdiagnosed with the condition…

As a result, you may be prescribed drugs that can damage your health or quality of life simply because seeing your doctor makes you nervous.

In a bold move to eliminate this common mis-treatment, Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) has torn up the guidance sheet on hypertension diagnosis. From now they will require that high blood pressure diagnoses, usually based on office blood pressure readings of 140/90 or above, be confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and/or home blood pressure readings carried out by the patient.

The new guidance aims to eliminate or greatly reduce the frequency of misdiagnosis due to a common condition called white coat hypertension. The syndrome occurs when a patient’s blood pressure rises abnormally through natural feelings of stress, nervousness or anxiety aroused by a medical setting.

People with white coat hypertension will have normal blood pressure during routine everyday life; their high blood pressure is confined to the doctor’s office. The potential for error should be obvious, yet the NHS estimates that up to 25% of the 12 million people in the United Kingdom being treated for high blood pressure have been misdiagnosed.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM): A Better Way To Diagnosis Hypertension…

ABPM is a far more predictable method of diagnosing high blood pressure than isolated office readings as it tracks a person’s blood pressure on a 24-hour, round the clock basis. The subject wears an arm cuff attached to a small digital monitor unit often worn on the belt. The device measures the subject’s blood pressure at preset intervals throughout the day and even while sleeping.

The picture that emerges from ABPM is not only useful for diagnosing hypertension but also shows when a person’s blood pressure rises and falls and many other important factors. This can be useful for interpreting how different activities and other factors affect your blood pressure. It can even help to determine the best schedule for taking medications to lower blood pressure.

Self-monitoring of blood pressure in the home can also prove useful to prevent misdiagnosis of hypertension. While not as detailed as ABPM, blood pressure readings in a comfortable home setting tend to prevent white coat syndrome. Simple digital monitors for home use are affordable and reasonably accurate.

Short-term costs for longer-term savings (not to mention better health and peace of mind!)…

The only drawback in all this is that ABPM is much more expensive than the old “pull up your sleeve” routine in the doctor’s office. Medical centers and practices will need to make some up-front investment in devices to ramp up to the kind of supply they will need to provide ABPM to every potential high blood pressure patient.

But the long-term advantages are significant savings through reduced spending on medication and patient follow-up care. The NHS figures the new guidelines will be saving them considerable money within 5 years. If you’re under a private healthcare system or insurance plan that could be money in your pocket.

But the financial savings are nothing compared to savings in the human cost of misdiagnosis. High blood pressure is a troubling condition to live with, constantly hearing how it leads to heart disease, heart attack or stroke.

Blood pressure medications are not easy to live with either. They may be preferable to chronic hypertension (only when all natural methods have failed) but most patient’s struggle with their side effects. What’s more, every drug poses unpredictable risks to long-term health.

Side effects, long-term health risks: a fair trade to beat the worst consequences of hypertension… but what if you don’t even have the condition (like the millions of others who are misdiagnosed)?! What cost then?

What do the new U.K. blood pressure guidelines mean for you?

If you live in the U.K. your local GP will already be adopting the new guidelines. If you’re under a different healthcare system still using old-fashioned methods of diagnosis you should bring this up with your doctor if you are suspected of having high blood pressure.

DO NOT accept a life-changing diagnosis of hypertension based on doctor’s office readings alone. You owe it to yourself to get ABPM, even if you have to carry some of the cost yourself. At the very least, get yourself a cheap monitor and track your own blood pressure a couple times a day over a week or two. Keep a log of your readings and show them to your doctor, especially if they contradict his or her office readings.

If you’re already on blood pressure medication your situation is a bit more complicated. Assuming the medication is controlling your blood pressure, ABPM is pointless. But if you suspect that you were misdiagnosed you should also discuss this with your healthcare professional.

Your only possible recourse is a medically supervised, controlled reduction in medication along with frequent blood pressure monitoring. This can be a long, slow process, even with a cooperative doctor. But, again, you owe it to yourself if you think you may be taking medications without good reason.

FINAL WORD: More than three years ago I wrote about high blood pressure misdiagnosis in my article So You Think You Know Your Blood Pressure? and I urged everyone in this situation to insist on ABPM before accepting a diagnosis and treatment, especially with medication.

So I’m very happy to see the NHS adopt these sensible new guidelines (although I do doubt that my article played a role in their decision!). I hope that other health systems and insurance providers will follow suit. In the meantime, we all need to look after our own health interests and insist on prudent treatment at all times.

Have we taken a wrong turn to lower blood pressure through our obsession with low-fat/no-fat diets and foods?

In my last post I discussed how health myths about red meat and animal fat may actually be doing our heart, blood pressure and overall health more harm than good. Now it seems that red meat may be just one casualty in a much bigger and much more dangerous battle…

It turns out that our misguided fear of dietary fat in general may actually be increasing our risk of high blood pressure and heart disease!

For most of our lives so-called health and lifestyle experts have subjected us to a relentless demonization of dietary fats and cholesterol, nutrients that are found naturally in countless foods. The worst abuse has been reserved for saturated animal fats such as those found in red meat and dairy foods.

In fact, dietary fat has long been suspected of playing a major role in high blood pressure. The DASH diet (Dietary Approaches To Stop Hypertension), for example, prescribes restricted consumption of red meat and use of low-fat or non-fat dairy products as an effective strategy for lowering blood pressure.

Other sources are far more fanatical in their anti-fat agendas. Crusading health “advice” has generated such irrational levels of fat-phobia that many people refuse to touch red meat at all and stridently avoid all but non-fat dairy products.

In response to changing market demands, meat producers have largely managed to “breed out” the fat in their products. The extremely lean meat that results is assumed to be healthier (an assumption that serves to justify sacrificing much of the meat’s natural flavor that is normally provided by its fat).

Anti-fat hysteria has affected the dairy industry even more perversely with many people having swapped natural, nutrient-rich milk for less nutritious low-fat products or even more aneamic non-fat versions.

Then there are the countless low-fat and non-fat processed foods designed by food manufacturers to cash in on the health craze. Worst of all are the fat substitutes used to replace not just the taste but also the look and texture of natural fats in foods.

And it’s not just animal fats that have suffered; even vegetable fats have met with suspicion. At the height of the anti-fat hysteria some TV chefs even took to teaching how to saute chicken and other meats in… water!

But can we thank our new-found food puritanism for plunging levels of high blood pressure and heart disease?

Sadly, no. You may imagine that sacrificing the earthy and natural pleasures of traditional varieties of red meat, dairy and other foods is a fair trade for lower blood pressure and better health… but the facts fail to bear this out. Most indicators show that – despite the deluge of fat-free food products of the last 30 years - rates of high blood pressure and heart disease remain stubbornly high while obesity increases at epidemic rates.

So what’s gone wrong? Are people still consuming too much fat (are they not frightened enough yet?) Or do the facts demand a different interpretation of our beliefs about food and health?

The facts that are emerging show that fats and cholesterol – far from being killers – are “essential to life”. According to a new study by the Cambridge Nutrition Clinic in the U.K.:

Fats and cholesterol help create and protect the white blood cells and millions of other cells that repair the wall linings when damaged.

‘The so-called ‘bad’ type of cholesterol, LDL, is specifically sent to the wound by the liver and this is why patients with heart disease are seen to have high levels in their body.

Unfortunately, because LDL is found at the ‘crime scene’, the cholesterol is mistakenly blamed for the heart condition when in fact it is nature’s way of trying to combat it.

We’ve been subjected to relentless medical advice demonising natural fats and cholesterol but they are in fact essential to life.

Extensive reviews of the available studies have shown me that the myth of heart disease being down to fat is wrong.

Natasha Campbell-McBride, M.D.
Cambridge Nutrition Clinic

So if fat that clogs up arteries is not the demon behind, first, high blood pressure and then heart disease… what is?

Maybe high blood acidity, if a new theory that’s rapidly gaining recognition is correct. But that’s another article…

Unfortunately, theories about the causes of high blood pressure and heart disease are not just matters for debate by medical scientists; wrong beliefs actually do us harm. Research suggests that modern diets absurdly low in fat weaken our immune systems and hinder the body’s natural healing mechanisms.

The ultimate irony is that a lack of essential fats and cholesterol may allow damage in blood vessels to reach critical levels, which can lead to hypertension, heart attack, stroke and organ failure.

A balanced diet for lower blood pressure…

It’s been said many times but it’s still worth repeating: there are no bad foods! A healthy diet is a balance of natural foods in their whole and natural state.

Healthy blood pressure (which often reflects your general state of health) is especially dependent on a natural balance of minerals and other essential nutrients, a balance occurring naturally in a varied diet of real food.

Excessive consumption of processed foods, food substitutes and fake foods of all types (including many so-called “healthy options”) is unbalanced, unnatural and unhealthy.